Posted by: Schuyler R. Thorpe | July 15, 2011

South Dakota Abortion Law Blocked Due To Health Concerns Of The Mother

(I’m happy! This means that women won’t have to wait extended periods of time to get an abortion–if the life of the mother is endangered.

What I don’t quite understand is how politicians can THINK they know what’s best for a women, when 99% of the men who legislate AGAINST their reproductive rights have never been pregnant at ALL…?

SO HOW THE FUCK WOULD THEY KNOW WHAT’S BEST FOR BOTH THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN BABY???)

Federal judge blocks South Dakota abortion law

MINNEAPOLIS (Reuters) – A federal judge on Thursday blocked a new South Dakota abortion law requiring the longest waiting period in the nation at 72-hours and a meeting at an anti-abortion counseling center before a woman can have the procedure.

The ruling on the South Dakota law, which was to take effect Friday, came as two Kansas City-area clinics prepared to asked another federal judge on Friday to allow them to continue performing abortions in the face of new state laws.

The South Dakota law, signed by Republican Governor Dennis Daugaard, also requires a doctor to certify that the pregnant woman has not been coerced into having an abortion and that the potential complications of an abortion have been explained.

Planned Parenthood, which operates the only center that performs abortions in South Dakota, sued to block the law and called the ruling a “decisive victory.”

“This law represents a blatant intrusion by politicians into difficult decisions women and families sometimes need to make,” said Sarah Stoesz, president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota.

Daugaard said the decision was not a surprise.

“I believe everyone agrees — no matter what their stance on abortion — that it’s a laudable goal to reduce abortions by encouraging consideration of other alternatives,” Daugaard said in a statement.

In a 61-page opinion granting the preliminary injunction, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Karen Schreier found Planned Parenthood’s challenge of the counseling centers and waiting period would likely succeed.

The help center requirements “constitute a substantial obstacle to a woman’s decision to obtain an abortion because they force a woman against her will to disclose her decision to undergo an abortion to a pregnancy help center employee before she can undergo an abortion,” Schreier wrote.

The three-day waiting period also effectively forces a woman to make two trips to the one available clinic and potentially wait a month between visits, she found.

Schreier also noted that no other state has laws that require similar waiting periods, a required counseling session at a “pregnancy help center” or for a doctor to certify that a woman has not been coerced.

South Dakota has been at the center of some of the most bitter recent fights over abortion, which was legalized in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade.

State lawmakers passed laws in 2006 and 2008 to ban most abortions unless they were necessary to save a woman’s life. Voters later overturned both bans.

The South Dakota law is one of many abortion curbs pushed by conservative lawmakers in dozens of states this year. Other proposals included bans on late-term abortions and requirements that providers offer women sonograms of their fetuses.

In Indiana, lawmakers sought to strip government funding from Planned Parenthood because it performs abortions. The law signed by Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels in May was struck down last week by a judge.

Indiana is appealing that decision.

On Friday, two clinics refused licenses by the Kansas state health department — the Center for Women’s Health and Aid for Women — will ask a federal judge to block the state of Kansas from enforcing new licensing requirements.

The Republican-dominated Kansas legislature passed a law setting out tough requirements for operating a clinic performing abortions and Republican Governor Sam Brownback signed the law.

The clinics are asking U.S. District Judge Carlos Murguia to find the new rules to be unreasonable and imposed on unfairly short notice.

Cheryl Pilate, a lawyer representing Aid to Women, said Thursday the new laws onerous and then imposed an impossible time line.

“It’s really a catch-22,” Pilate said. “It’s a set-up for failure. The unreasonableness of this is pretty clear.”

The third clinic in Kansas, Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, was notified Thursday afternoon that it had met regulations and will get its license, officials said. It had been prepared to seek an injunction if it were denied.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

The Jefferies Tube

Boldly Blogging Where Many Have Blogged Before...

Gypsy Nerds

Gett'n our travel on!

Dreams of Dark Angels

The blog of fantasy writer Storm Constantine

Passion with a Dark and Dangerous Twist

A site for romance and thriller author, Cassandre Dayne

H.J. Bradley

The world of an aspiring indie author.

Q13 FOX News

Seattle and Western Washington's source for breaking news, weather, and sports. Home of Washington’s Most Wanted and the Seattle Seahawks.

blindoggbooks

Author Tim Baker shares his thoughts, hopes and dreams. (mostly his thoughts)

Monica Enderle Pierce

Stories that stay with you.

Kait Nolan

Smart, sassy, small town Southern romance that makes you feel like home

Guild Of Dreams

Build Your World and They Will Come

Trent Lewin

Fiction, and other made-up stories

Wildhorse33's Blog

freeing the creative spirit

Here's To Us

Nerdiness Encouraged

%d bloggers like this: